Europe
The Guardian

US firms that kept DEI policies despite ‘go woke, go broke’ threats thrived

‘In the days after the executive orders were signed, companies that kept their DEI policies actually performed better on the stock market than those that didn’t.’ Composite: The Guardian/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreen‘In the days after the executive orders were signed, companies that kept their DEI policies actually performed better on the stock market than those that didn’t.’ Composite: The Guardian/Getty ImagesDEI policiesUS firms that kept DEI policies despite ‘go woke, go broke’ threats thrived Exclusive: Companies that kept policies did just as well financially, even after Trump’s executive order, as those that didn’t Conservative backlash was supposed to put an end to the diversity, inclusion and equity (DEI) movement as companies were warned “go woke, go broke”. In January 2025, Donald Trump delivered a death knell, ending DEI within the federal government with executive orders and threatening to target companies that still supported it. Companies including Google, Goldman Sachs, McDonald’s and Walmart that had embraced DEI years earlier fell into line and announced an end to their policies. But new research published on Friday and shared exclusively with the Guardian found that companies that resisted the pressure and kept their DEI practices, including Costco, Apple and Delta Air Lines, performed just as well as their competitors who pulled back. For the research, Jacob Grumbach, an associate professor at at the University of California at Berkeley’s Goldman School of Public Policy, analyzed how S&P 500 companies fared after Trump’s January executive order. He used what economists define as “abnormal returns” – the difference between how a stock was expected to perform versus how it actually performed – to isolate the impact of a company’s DEI decision. What he found was the firms that kept their DEI policies or voted down anti-DEI shareholder resolutions did just as well financially, even after Trump’s executive order, as firms that didn’t. In the days after the executive orders were signed, companies that kept their DEI policies actually performed better on the stock market than those that didn’t. Whether or not DEI benefits a company’s bottom line can depend on its consumers. Grumbach noted companies that publicly stood firm on their DEI policies might have known they could weather a political storm. Apple, for example, may have known it could maintain its DEI efforts in a way that Tractor Supply, another prominent company that pulled back its policies, could not. The “go woke, go broke” movement found its power in 2023, when a series of conservative backlashes against companies gained momentum. Bud Light sales dropped following a conservative boycott after the beer company featured the transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Target became an embodiment of its name after fury erupted over its pride month merchandise. Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor, embarked on a prolonged fight with Disney after the company vocally opposed the state’s “don’t say gay” bill. “Cracker Barrel has fallen,” a conservative group wrote after the restaurant chain celebrated pride month on social media. Then, also in 2023, the US supreme court ruled that race-conscious admissions policies in higher education were unconstitutional, opening the floodgates for legal challenges against DEI policies in other places, including the workplace. “That really created a lot of fear and panic in corporate America and is what led to a lot of the pullbacks around DEI,” said David Glasgow, executive director of the Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging at New York University’s law school. “When Trump came into office for the second time, that just poured fuel on an already raging fire.” After Trump’s executive orders, companies had to weigh the risks. Many quietly scrapped the DEI promises they had made after the murder of George Floyd and the racial reckoning it inspired. Some ended up facing a reverse backlash: the Twin Cities Pride parade dropped Target, which is based in Minneapolis, as a sponsor after the company withdrew some of its DEI policies. But the reality of this pullback was probably different from what was seen in the headlines, Glasgow said. Of the many companies he spoke to, most “made adjustments to their diversity principles on account of legal and regulatory environments”.

US firms that kept DEI policies despite ‘go woke, go broke’ threats thrived
Europe
The Guardian

Oil prices hover near $90 a barrel and gold hits two-month high after Trump makes new deal demands on Iran – business live

High street lender NatWest says it will offer emergency loans, interest rate cuts, and temporary pauses on loan repayments for struggling farmers hit by drought. The banking group said it was increasing funding and support for customers in the agricultural sector, as prolonged dry weather leaves farmers struggling with water shortages, lower yields, and unseasonably early harvests. Farmers working with livestock, meanwhile, have been hit by reduced grass growth and increased feed costs, while warmer conditions are increasing the risk of outbreaks of disease. NatWest say they are now offering extra support ranging from a temporary pause on loan payments, to interest rate reductions, emergency loans, and overdrafts. They said they would also fund farmers looking to prepare for future heatwaves, including by building new infrastructure like extra water storage and reservoirs that can be used during periods of drought. NatWest said it was not yet seeing a surge in demand for extra funding but expected pressures on some farming businesses “to build over the coming weeks and months.” Ian Burrow, head of agriculture at NatWest Group, said: With harvests progressing earlier than usual in some areas and livestock farmers already relying on winter feed stocks due to poor grass growth, cashflow and feed availability could become increasingly challenging.

Oil prices hover near $90 a barrel and gold hits two-month high after Trump makes new deal demands on Iran – business live
North America
CNBC Finance

Boeing sells eVTOL subsidiaries, takes stake in Archer

In a move to increase its focus on core operations, Boeing is selling three of its subsidiaries to Archer Aviation in exchange for a stake in the startup that focuses on electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft, known as eVTOLs for short. Boeing's stake in Archer will amount to 19.75% of Class A shares of the company and comes with options to purchase more shares over the next four years, according a regulatory filing. The subsidiaries include Wisk Aero, which has been developing an autonomous eVTOL, and SkyGrid, which is developing air traffic management systems for air taxis as urban air mobility moves from test flights to commercial operations. The third Boeing subsidiary being sold, Insitu, develops and manufactures high-altitude drones that have been used worldwide, including by the U.S. Navy. Brian Yutko, Boeing vice president of commercial airplanes product development, said the deal "allows Wisk, SkyGrid and Insitu to accelerate capability development and time to market while ensuring Boeing capitalizes on its investments in these technologies over the past two decades through continued development in our core businesses." For Archer, the transaction strengthens its position developing eVTOLs and the networks to support them. Insitu also helps Archer extend its military portfolio. In announcing the acquisitions, Archer CEO Adam Goldstein said, "This is the next big step forward in becoming a diversified platform, rapidly growing our revenue base and bringing scale to our business." Both companies stand to benefit from the deal. Archer is targeting commercial eVTOL flights by the end of this year or early next year and is eager to establish itself as urban air taxis take off around the U.S. By acquiring Wisk and SkyGrid, Archer solidifies its portfolio, especially with the autonomous eVTOL technology Wisk has been developing. Boeing also benefits by shedding subsidiaries that are not central to its commercial airplanes, defense and space operations. Since taking over as CEO in August 2024, Kelly Ortberg has repeatedly said Boeing needs to focus on improving its three primary businesses. Just a few months after becoming CEO, Ortberg made it clear Boeing's path to profitability would mean streamlining the aerospace giant. "We need to reset priorities and create a leaner, more focused organization," he said in October 2024. Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services.

Boeing sells eVTOL subsidiaries, takes stake in Archer
Europe
BBC Business

Electric vehicle sales targets could be cut after pressure from car makers

Image source, Getty ImagesByAlex DanielBusiness reporterPublished14 August 2026The UK's electric vehicle (EV) sales target could be cut after the government launched a review following pressure from car makers. Currently, manufacturers must ensure a percentage of the cars they sell each year are zero emissions, with the target rising each year to reach 80% by 2030. The government has now said it is considering cutting that figure to as far as 50% of all sales by the end of the decade, which it will consult on until late October. Environmental groups have argued that watering down the target undermines the UK's long-term climate goals. Under the current policy, known as the ZEV mandate, the percentage of new car sales that need to be EVs increases each year, from 33% for 2026 until it reaches 80% by 2030. It started at 22% in 2024. An outright ban on selling purely petrol or diesel cars past 2030 will stay in place, something that Labour promised in its election manifesto. However the changes now being consulted on could allow car makers to sell more hybrid vehicles as a proportion of the UK's overall sales. That means if the government drops pure electric sales targets to 50%, the other 50% would need to be hybrid. Another option would be keeping the target at 80% but with flexibility for car makers extending as far as 2034. A longer term deadline for phasing out new hybrid sales would also remain in place for 2035. A ban on selling new petrol and diesel vehicles by 2030 was first announced by Boris Johnson when he was prime minister, then pushed back to 2035 by his successor Rishi Sunak. Labour has previously accused previous Conservative governments of "moving goalposts on phase out dates".

Electric vehicle sales targets could be cut after pressure from car makers
Europe
BBC Business

Trump Media reports $238m loss as crypto falls

President Donald Trump's social media company reported a loss of $238m (£176m) between April and June as it branched into ventures unrelated to media, including cryptocurrencies. The quarterly loss is more than 10 times the amount reported during the same period a year earlier, according to the Trump Media and Technology Group, which owns the President's Truth Social platform. The firm says it will refocus on its social media mission, which includes a controversial service that offers faster access to market-moving posts from the platform's most influential users. The group's interim chief executive officer Kevin McGurn said on Monday that more than 10 customers have signed up for the service. The company posted $1.7m in revenue, which it said is up 89% from the same period a year before, but suffered overall loss due to the drop in cryptocurrencies. It added that it closed the second quarter with total assets of $2bn and financial assets of about $1.9bn, which includes cash, short-term investments and digital currencies. The group has yet to turn a profit, even as it expands into areas including cryptocurrency holdings and clean-energy investments. Trump Media is more of a crypto holdings firm "wrapped around" a media company, and the bulk of its losses have come from that strategy, Markus Thielen, an analyst from 10x Research, told the BBC. The company is diversifying beyond its crypto business into areas such as social media, though those ventures have yet to generate significant revenue, Thielen said. In July, Trump Media announced a plan to give Wall Street traders faster access to posts on Truth Social, where Trump frequently makes announcements. It has been viewed as a way to give subscribers an edge in trading stocks and other heavily traded assets. The move has prompted legal and ethical questions, including whether it is right that a company - of which the president's family remains the majority shareholder - stands to potentially profit from his own public statements. The new service is "expected to provide the company with a new revenue stream," Trump Media said in its earnings statement on Monday.

Trump Media reports $238m loss as crypto falls
North America
CNBC Finance

Nvidia lines up $500 billion in financing as CEO Jensen Huang tells CNBC his chips are ‘investable asset’

Nvidia is attempting to turn its artificial intelligence chips into Wall Street's newest asset class, partnering with six large asset managers on a $500 billion financing push designed to treat compute infrastructure much like commercial real estate, toll roads or other assets to borrow against. The chipmaker signed memorandums of understanding with Apollo Global Management, Blackstone, BlackRock, Brookfield Asset Management, Goldman Sachs and KKR to establish financing platforms for Nvidia's customers, the company said Monday in a statement. Executives from the seven companies joined CNBC's Becky Quick in a rare, live joint interview to discuss the announcement. The effort aims to mobilize more than $500 billion in third-party capital for hyperscalers, frontier AI labs and enterprises to build out data centers and acquire Nvidia hardware, marking a potentially important shift in how AI infrastructure is funded. By using institutional credit, insurance funds and private capital to underwrite GPUs and data centers, Nvidia is helping its end users secure financing without tapping their own balance sheets. "This is really the first time that technology chips have become an investable asset class," Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang told CNBC. "These are revenue-generating assets now. They're productive, they're long-lived, they're fungible, they're flexible." Huang argued that because Nvidia's hardware is broadly adopted and transferable across customers, lenders can reliably underwrite compute as a revenue-generating asset with an extended life. Historically, GPUs have been viewed as rapidly depreciating hardware. Nvidia's effort challenges that assumption, transforming AI compute capacity into long-term, bankable infrastructure, though skeptics may question whether AI chips can retain their value as newer generations emerge. "Fundamentally, what's different about this industry and this way of doing computing is that the computer is now part of the infrastructure, like electricity, like the internet, and so you have to think about it like it's infrastructure," Huang said in the CNBC interview. Alternative asset managers have been eager to deploy capital into digital infrastructure, tapping institutional and insurance capital to finance projects. Apollo and Blackstone, among others, have already structured debt and equity financing for companies including Anthropic. The financing push comes after a July swoon in global markets in which investors began asking whether Big Tech's AI investments would pay off. With hyperscalers on track to pour hundreds of billions into data centers and hardware, rating agencies like Moody's have warned that unprecedented capital expenditures are beginning to squeeze free cash flow and force tech giants into heavier debt loads. Leaders across the Wall Street group — including BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, Blackstone President Jon Gray and Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon — said in the news release Monday that compute has rapidly evolved into a critical asset class driving the next leg of global economic growth. "We're in a pivotal moment of a historic AI investment cycle," Solomon said in the release. "Our investment and distribution roles reflect our confidence in NVIDIA's leadership, and we're excited for the new opportunity to create a market for credit backed by NVIDIA compute."

Nvidia lines up $500 billion in financing as CEO Jensen Huang tells CNBC his chips are ‘investable asset’
North America
Yahoo Finance

Apple’s Dip Below $310 is a Great Accumulation Opportunity

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL | AAPL Price Prediction) at $308.26 trades at a level some long-term holders view as attractive after the slide below $310. The stock has given back 7.47% since Q3 earnings at $333, while the S&P 500 moved higher, creating one of the widest recent dislocations between Apple and the broader market this year. Apple’s installed base exceeds 2.5 billion active devices, turning each product cycle into a compounding annuity. Services now clears roughly $30 billion a quarter at a 76.7% gross margin. The recent pullback reflects a mix of concerns: a one-time tariff refund tailwind in the June quarter, memory cost pressure heading into fall, and the CXMT supply chain story that dominated Reddit last week. The bull case starts with the iPhone 17 lineup, which drove Q3 iPhone revenue to $54.25 billion, up from $44.58 billion a year earlier. Tim Cook described it as the “strongest June quarter ever, with double-digit revenue growth across iPhone, Mac and Services, and in every geographic segment.” Services expansion, the all-new Siri unveiled at WWDC26, and a fresh $100 billion buyback authorization form a rare combination of growth and capital return. Apple posted a 171.42% return on equity, a 53.35% return on invested capital, and a 31.97% operating margin. Nine consecutive quarterly EPS beats, most recently $2.02 vs. $1.89, show consistent execution through supply constraints. The bear view is straightforward: at a trailing P/E of 36 for mid-teens revenue growth, and any wobble compresses the multiple fast. The Q3 gross margin got a roughly 2 percentage-point boost from tariff refunds and about $0.11 of EPS that will not repeat. Management flagged “significantly higher memory costs” ahead, and the CXMT price-cut standoff hints at eroding supplier leverage. Greater China remains the swing factor. Revenue there bounced to $25.53 billion in Q1 FY26 before settling at $18.82 billion in Q3. Polymarket traders assign only a 43.5% probability to AAPL closing August above $310. Apple sits 6% below its 52-week high of $344.27, near the 50-day moving average of $309.79, and well above the 200-day at $279.41. That marks a modest pullback rather than capitulation. Apple has repurchased $62.09 billion of stock in nine months, shrinking the float while patient investors deliberate. Apple currently trades at $308.26 against a consensus analyst target of $322.82, implying modest upside. The Wall Street breakdown skews bullish: 6 Strong Buy, 22 Buy, 14 Hold, 2 Sell, and 2 Strong Sell. Over the past year, AAPL has returned 35.06% versus 21.32% for the S&P 500, and year-to-date it is up 13.7% against 13.36% for the index. The forward P/E of 33 is elevated but reasonable against 28.7% quarterly earnings growth. The path to price appreciation runs through three overlapping catalysts over the next 12 months: an iPhone 18 launch that Polymarket puts at a 97.6% probability, easing supply constraints on Mac mini, Mac Studio, and MacBook Neo, and the personalized Siri rollout that positions Apple’s hardware-software ecosystem as the primary monetization gatekeeper for consumer AI. Risk/reward at this entry skews positive on the numbers. The bear scenario models a one-year price of $314.45, essentially flat, while the base case reaches $363.21 and the bull case $378.62. Downside is capped by a 53.35% ROIC business returning cash at scale. Upside compounds if Services keeps posting 16% growth. The thesis breaks if China revenue rolls over again, if memory costs pressure gross margin below the guided 47.5% to 48.5% range for multiple quarters, or if iPhone 18 demand disappoints. Watch the December quarter for holiday sell-through and the March quarter for margin normalization after tariff refunds fade. A $4.5 trillion compounder that just posted its strongest June quarter ever, trading at a 7% discount to a filing-week high with $100 billion of buybacks in flight, frames the current setup for long-term investors.

Apple’s Dip Below $310 is a Great Accumulation Opportunity
North America
Yahoo Finance

With a New iPhone Coming, Here’s What $10,000 in Apple Since the First One Is Worth

Speculation is building around the widely anticipated next Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL | AAPL Price Prediction) iPhone launch, expected as soon as next month. Leakers, supply-chain trackers, and analysts have spent weeks debating rumored designs, camera upgrades, and pricing tiers, though Apple has not officially confirmed an event or product lineup. It’s a familiar rhythm for the world’s largest company, and a good moment to look back at how those launches have compounded for long-term shareholders. Apple released the very first iPhone on June 29, 2007. Since then, the business has transformed from a hardware story into a services-heavy compounder. Services alone generated $30.74 billion in revenue in the June 2026 quarter, and the installed base crossed 2.5 billion active devices earlier this year. Tim Cook’s team has pursued aggressive capital returns, including a fresh $100 billion buyback authorization and a 4% dividend hike to $0.27 per share announced this spring. The iPhone 17 cycle, launched in September 2025, delivered a supercycle-style response. Apple has now posted nine consecutive earnings beats, capped by a June-quarter record of $109.42 billion in revenue, up 16.4% year over year. Four stock splits since going public (including the 4-for-1 in August 2020 and 7-for-1 in June 2014) kept the share price accessible along the way. Here’s the split-adjusted, price-return picture for a $10,000 investment in Apple versus the same amount in the S&P 500, measured through August 10, 2026. Apple has beaten the S&P 500 at every horizon shown, though the gap narrows sharply the closer you get to today. Holding through the 2018 correction, the 2020 pandemic panic, and the 2022 tech drawdown was the real challenge. Timing mattered, but the conviction to hold through downturns mattered more. The bull case rests on the expected iPhone refresh reigniting the hardware upgrade cycle and Services continuing to grow at a mid-teens rate, supported by ongoing buybacks. Apple’s strategy of converting product launches into free cash flow, then returning that capital to shareholders, is one of the most durable in mega-cap tech. The bear case centers on valuation. At a trailing P/E near 35 and a $4.5 trillion market cap, the law of large numbers presents a real ceiling on growth, and any stumble in the iPhone cycle or China demand would hit hard. Apple looks like a durable compounder at these levels, though return expectations should be reset to reflect its sheer size.

With a New iPhone Coming, Here’s What $10,000 in Apple Since the First One Is Worth
Europe
The Guardian

Tesla paid Elon Musk 2.5m times more as CEO than its average worker in 2025

Elon Musk attends a session during the Cannes Lions international festival of creativity on 19 June 2024 in Cannes, France. Photograph: Marc Piasecki/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenElon Musk attends a session during the Cannes Lions international festival of creativity on 19 June 2024 in Cannes, France. Photograph: Marc Piasecki/Getty ImagesBusinessTesla paid Elon Musk 2.5m times more as CEO than its average worker in 2025Tech billionaire’s $158.3bn deal an outlier in report showing widening gap of CEO to worker pay at top companies Elon Musk received over 2.5m times as much compensation at Tesla as the company’s average worker, according to a new report on the growing gap between top corporate executives and their workers. Musk’s $158.3bn pay deal was an outlier but came as the gap between CEO and worker pay continued to grow. Excluding Musk, last year the average ratio of CEO to worker pay for the top S&P 500 companies was 312 to 1, up from a 285:1 ratio in 2024. With Musk, the average pay ratio was 5,387:1, according to the executive pay watch report released this week by the AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US. “In 2025, Elon Musk received the median Tesla worker’s pay every 4.23 seconds – less time than it takes to read this sentence,” states the report. “A majority of S&P 500 CEOs made more in one day than the median US worker made in one year.” Average CEO pay, excluding Musk, was $22.8m in 2025, up from $18.9m in 2024. With Tesla accounted for, the average increases to $340.1m. The report notes workers’ share of US national income has fallen to the lowest level since the second world war. The report also looks at Donald Trump’s income in 2025. At $2.2bn, largely from his crypto holdings, Trump’s income rose nearly 254% from 2024. The median US worker would require 43,154 years to earn what Trump received in 2025. “This is political grift unlike what we have ever seen in our lifetimes, perhaps ever, but it only tells part of the story of how CEOs and the Trump administration has rigged our economy to enrich themselves at the expense of working people,” said Fred Redmond, AFL-CIO’s secretary-treasurer. “Trump’s radical budget bill that Republicans rammed through Congress last year, it made drastic cuts to healthcare, food assistance for children and families in order to give massive tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy.” The report cited data demonstrating the economic struggles of most Americans; 33% of US adults have no retirement savings, 37% of adults do not have enough money to cover a $400 emergency expense, 26% of US adults have skipped medical care due to costs, and 23% of renters in the US have fallen behind on rent over the past year. “As President Trump said, he has a lot of assets because he was a massively successful businessman prior to becoming President, which was why he was elected to office in the first place,” said a White House spokesperson in an email. “All of the President’s assets are in held in fully discretionary accounts managed by independent third-party financial institutions. There are no conflicts of interest.”

Tesla paid Elon Musk 2.5m times more as CEO than its average worker in 2025