North America
CNBC Economy

Russia says its economy is strong. It just fired a top economist who warned otherwise

Russian government officials told CNBC that the economy is strong and healthy despite "unprecedented foreign pressure" following the country's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022. That message sits in stark contrast with the views of the former chief economist of Russia's state-controlled development bank VEB, who was dismissed on Sunday after comments he made earlier in the year were reported in Russian-language media. Andrei Klepach, a former deputy economy minister, was reportedly fired after presenting a report warning that Russia could not win a prolonged war of attrition with Ukraine and predicting a major social crisis. Klepach's dismissal was directly linked to his scathing economic assessment, according to exiled independent Russian outlet The Bell, which cited unnamed sources familiar with the matter when it first reported the news. CNBC could not independently verify the report. "In this war of attrition, we will not win the competition. We're under the illusion that everything will collapse. It hasn't, and it won't. Our costs are mounting," Klepach said in a speech presented to fellow economists on May 21, according to a translation. "I believe Russia won't collapse, but I'm almost certain that we'll end up in a social crisis. We won't collapse economically, but our lag will widen, with all the ensuing consequences," he added. The move to dismiss Klepach appears to underscore the Kremlin's zero-tolerance approach to public criticism and opposition to its military campaign in Ukraine after nearly four-and-a-half years of war. Russian government officials remain defiant over the country's economic situation. The Russian embassy to the U.K. told CNBC that Russia's fiscal position remains "significantly stronger" than that of many Western economies, pointing to foreign public debt of around $57 billion — noting that this is "considerably less" than the amounts the U.S., U.K., Italy or France spend on debt servicing alone. "The Russian economy remains resilient, as does the will of our people," a spokesperson for the Russian Embassy to the U.K. told CNBC by email. "Attempts to undermine Russia through economic pressure have not produced the results their authors expected," they added. "On the contrary, the West – including the UK – is itself paying a substantial price for its reckless sanctions policy. British businesses have lost access to the Russian market, while disrupted supply chains and higher energy and commodity costs have imposed additional costs on the U.K. economy.

Russia says its economy is strong. It just fired a top economist who warned otherwise
North America
CNBC Finance

Home Depot reaffirms guidance amid 'frozen housing market conditions'

Home Depot on Tuesday reported fiscal second-quarter results that beat Wall Street expectations on the top and bottom lines and reaffirmed its full fiscal-year guidance. "We continue to operate in what I call 'frozen housing market' conditions, but we also know that we're taking share and that we're serving our customers better every day," CFO Richard McPhail told CNBC. "It's a reflection of the continued investment we've made and the focus on executing our strategy." McPhail said Home Depot saw "broad engagement" across its categories, including in both its pro and do-it-yourself businesses, but the greater uncertainty in the market led the company to reaffirm rather than raise its guidance. He added that Home Depot's customer is "a healthy cohort," though he said the company has still not seen consumers return to big projects. "They've told us they have the means to spend, they're just hesitant," he told CNBC. "While we're happy with their level of engagement in the first half, they do tell us they're worried about inflation, about fuel costs and about, about general uncertainty, and so there is a little bit of hesitancy there as the project gets bigger." The home improvement retailer reported net income of $4.77 billion, or $4.79 per share, compared with $4.55 billion, or $4.58 per share, the year prior. Excluding one-time items, Home Depot reported adjusted earnings per share of $4.92. Revenue rose 5.7% to $47.86 billion. Home Depot saw comparable sales rise 1.7%, beating expectations that they would be up 0.9%, according to StreetAccount. McPhail said it is the highest comparable sales number the company has posted since the fiscal third quarter of 2022. Home Depot also reaffirmed its fiscal 2026 guidance, which it said includes tariff refunds that are "expected to partially offset unplanned fuel, energy, and other product input costs." McPhail added that the tariff refunds allow the retailer to "maintain value" despite cost pressures in other areas. The company expects total sales growth for the year to be between 2.5% and 4.5% and operating margin between 12.4% and 12.6%. "The story of the quarter is a story of share gain with the pro and the consumer, and we're confident that our investments are working to allow us to win in the market," McPhail said. Home Depot has been pressured by lower housing turnover, higher mortgage rates and economic uncertainty as customers have put off projects that come with buying a new home. Still, the company has been trying to attract more pro shoppers, a cohort that executives have previously said is largely unaffected by the macroeconomic conditions. "We're focused on controlling what we can control," McPhail said. "We have been consistent through the years that in spite of a frozen housing environment, we're going to keep leaning into investment because we know that over the long run, conditions for home improvement demand are strong."

Home Depot reaffirms guidance amid 'frozen housing market conditions'
Asia
The Hindu BusinessLine

E20 petrol: Don’t make E10 at home or use unverified fuel additives, says former NITI Aayog official

Worried that E20 could cut mileage or cause problems in older petrol vehicles, motorists are turning to Instagram recipes that suggest mixing regular E20 with expensive 100-octane petrol to recreate E10, and to D2C brands selling “E20 enhancer” additives promising better mileage and protection. Both tap genuine concerns over cars and two-wheelers not designed around the fuel now sold at pumps, but neither is a shortcut that motorists should experiment with, says Randheer Singh, former Director, Electric Mobility and Clean Energy at NITI Aayog and Founder and CEO of ForeSee Advisors. “It’s not the simple blending that you mix this and that and the blending happens,” Singh said during a bl.Conversations webinar hosted by businessline. The Instagram workaround appears deceptively simple: dilute E20 with premium petrol and bring down the ethanol concentration towards E10. But doing that consistently requires knowing what fuel is already in the tank, the ethanol content of what is being added and the quantities of each. Get that mix wrong from one refill to the next and the vehicle could repeatedly receive different ethanol concentrations. “Sometimes you are providing your vehicle E10, sometimes E5, sometimes E15, sometimes E20,” Singh said. “How will you keep a tab on your vehicle itself, and as to what type of fuel you are putting in your vehicle?” It also becomes harder to establish whether a subsequent mileage drop, misfire or other problem is caused by the fuel, the improvised mixture or an unrelated mechanical fault. The second workaround comes from D2C brands selling additives promoted as “E20 enhancers” or ethanol cures, with claims around mileage, performance and fuel-system protection. Singh said motorists should use only additives recommended by the vehicle manufacturer or validated for fuel compatibility. “Don’t unload chemistry into a BS-6 fuel and emission system,” he warned. “That’s really going to create a problem.” For an older car or two-wheeler, Singh advised owners to first check the fuel-lid label, owner’s manual and the manufacturer’s latest guidance for that particular model and year. If compatibility remains unclear, ask the manufacturer. Owners of vehicles used infrequently should avoid leaving them sitting with old petrol for months. Because ethanol attracts moisture, Singh advised keeping the tank reasonably full, around 60 per cent or more, when the vehicle is going to remain parked, reducing the empty space in which condensation can form. Fuel caps and seals should be kept in good condition and any fuel smell or seepage investigated promptly.

E20 petrol: Don’t make E10 at home or use unverified fuel additives, says former NITI Aayog official
Asia
The Hindu BusinessLine

E20-only petrol rollout came too early, E10 unlikely to return anytime soon: Former NITI official

India moved too quickly in making E20 the only regular petrol-blend available nationally, according to Randheer Singh, former Director, Electric Mobility and Clean Energy at NITI Aayog. Close to 12 crore of its estimated 19 crore petrol vehicles—bought before E20-compliant models became the norm—have no easy lower-ethanol alternative, he pointed out India reached 20 per cent ethanol blending five years ahead of its original 2030 target, but the fuel transition has outpaced replacement of cars and two-wheelers that typically remain on the road for 10-15 years. Singh’s advice to owners caught in the transition is not to panic-sell an otherwise serviceable vehicle. “I think it is too early for all pumps to have only E20. This decision to have only E20 available at all the bunks is a bit premature,” Singh said during a bl.Conversations webinar hosted by businessline. But, for owners hoping lower-blend petrol will return, “I don’t think we will see E10 next to E20 anytime soon,” added Singh, who is also Founder & CEO of ForeSee Advisors. A parallel E10 supply has become a live policy question, particularly for an estimated 7.5-8 crore older two-wheelers. Maintaining separate refinery, depot, tanker and retail infrastructure for two petrol blends would, however, be difficult, Singh said. The transition also leaves unresolved who bears the cost if an older, out-of-warranty vehicle develops a fuel-system problem attributable to E20. Singh said there was no evidence of widespread engine failures. But absence of failures does not establish that every older model was designed, calibrated and material-certified for E20. Compatibility also does not mean optimisation. Singh estimated mileage loss at around 1-2 per cent for E20-optimised vehicles and about 5-6 per cent for compatible but non-optimised models, with some older vehicles potentially losing more. For owners driving roughly 20-40 km a day, that additional fuel expenditure may be too small to justify replacing a functioning vehicle. Higher-mileage users may have a stronger economic case to switch. Singh also does not expect E20 alone to cause a crash in used-vehicle values because millions of older vehicles will remain on the road. Age or fitness restrictions in some cities could pose a greater risk to residual values. When replacement eventually becomes necessary, Singh said buyers should not abandon petrol merely because of E20. “Don’t buy an EV because you’re frightened of E20,” he said. Buyers whose usage favours petrol can choose a vehicle explicitly engineered and optimised for E20. For city users considering electric, however, Singh said EV total-cost economics increasingly make sense, while EVs also provide greater certainty against future changes in petrol-blending policy.

E20-only petrol rollout came too early, E10 unlikely to return anytime soon: Former NITI official
Asia
The Hindu BusinessLine

EV, CNG car waiting jump to 3-4 months ahead of festival season

Indian automobile dealers are entering the festive season with around a month of overall stock, but are running short of the particular models, powertrains, battery packs and variants buyers want. The mismatch is leaving some customers waiting two to five months for delivery even before the year’s biggest vehicle-buying weeks begin. Waiting periods for high-demand electric cars have risen to three to four months from about one month five months ago, while the TVS iQube electric scooter carries a four-to-five-month queue. Maruti Suzuki’s new Brezza has an average wait of about two months, with its turbo-petrol and CNG versions accounting for more than 70 per cent of bookings, according to an August channel check by YES Securities. Passenger-vehicle inventories stand at roughly four weeks and two-wheeler stocks at four to five weeks. The mismatch has surfaced at the beginning rather than the peak of festive buying: Onam sales in Kerala grew more than 20 per cent year-on-year, while Ganesh Chaturthi, Navratri, Dhanteras and Diwali are still ahead. Enquiries and bookings for electric and CNG passenger vehicles have risen more than 30%, with demand growing at more than twice the pace of conventional ICE vehicles. Electric two-wheeler demand is growing 30-40%, against organic enquiry growth of 10-12% for the broader two-wheeler market. YES Securities attributed the surge to new launches and “negativity around E20”. Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles is recording stronger booking growth than peers, although Maruti Suzuki and Hyundai are witnessing similar trends. Tata’s battery warranty of around 15 years on key models, against eight years earlier, is also helping move EVs beyond the early-adopter category, the brokerage said. The headline shortage masks large differences between models and even variants. Separate August model-level delivery data show the Tiago EV Smart 19 and Pure+ 19 and Punch EV Smart 30 carrying some of the longest waits at 18-24 weeks. The Punch EV Smart 40 takes around 10-12 weeks. Move up the price ladder and the picture changes again. Mahindra’s XEV 9S and XEV 9e have indicative waits of around 16-20 weeks, while the Sierra EV Pure 65 takes 12-15 weeks and Maruti Suzuki’s e Vitara around eight to 12 weeks. But an EV badge doesn’t automatically mean a long queue. JSW MG Motor India’s Windsor EV has an indicative wait of four to eight weeks, the Tata Nexon EV three to four weeks and the Harrier EV two to three weeks. The Curvv EV can be available in one to two weeks. The dispersion suggests demand is clustering around particular launches, price points, battery packs and variants rather than creating an across-the-board shortage of electric cars. Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments. We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

EV, CNG car waiting jump to 3-4 months ahead of festival season
Asia
The Economic Times

Vedanta, Wipro among 10 stocks that saw biggest jump in retail holders in Q1. See full list

Retail investor participation in the Indian equity markets continues to demonstrate strong momentum, with millions of individual investors expanding their presence across key sectors. In the first quarter of the financial year, several prominent listed companies recorded a substantial increase in their retail shareholder base, reflecting heightened interest in major market players. Here are top 10 stocks with highest increase in retail participation. Vedanta recorded the highest quarterly increase, adding 4.86 lakh retail shareholders to grow its base from 20.52 lakh on March 31, 2026, to 25.38 lakh on June 30, 2026. The IT major secured second place by adding 4.08 lakh retail shareholders, expanding its total count from 25.50 lakh to 29.58 lakh. Bajaj Auto more than doubled its retail investor base by adding 3.27 lakh shareholders, rising from 2.94 lakh to 6.21 lakh. The bank saw its retail shareholder count expand by 2.98 lakh, moving up from 41.10 lakh to 44.08 lakh. RIL added 2.20 lakh retail shareholders during the quarter, bringing its total base from 42.52 lakh to 44.72 lakh. The IT giant increased its retail shareholder count by 2.04 lakh, growing from 26.43 lakh to 28.47 lakh. TCS added 1.50 lakh retail shareholders, expanding its base from 23.44 lakh to 24.94 lakh. Gujarat Energy registered an addition of 1.47 lakh retail shareholders, almost doubling its base from 1.68 lakh to 3.16 lakh. HCLTech grew its retail shareholder base by 1.41 lakh, moving from 8.40 lakh to 9.81 lakh. Ashok Leyland rounded off the top 10 list with an addition of 1.39 lakh retail shareholders, expanding its total count from 14.72 lakh to 16.12 lakh.(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Vedanta, Wipro among 10 stocks that saw biggest jump in retail holders in Q1. See full list
Asia
The Economic Times

These 12 equity mutual funds turned a Rs 10,000 SIP into over Rs 11 crore

Around 12 equity mutual funds turned a Rs 10,000 monthly SIP into over Rs 11 crore since inception, an ETMutualFunds analysis showed. The analysis covered around 305 equity funds, excluding sectoral and thematic funds. Of these, 110 funds turned the SIP into over Rs 11 crore, with the highest corpus reaching Rs 30 crore. (Source: ACE MF) Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Earlier known as Nippon India Growth Fund) launched in October 1995, turned the Rs 10,000 monthly SIP to Rs 29.32 crore with an XIRR of 22.22% since its inception. Franklin India Mid Cap Fund (Earlier known as Franklin India Prima Fund) turned the same monthly SIP amount to Rs 24.04 crore with an XIRR of 19.73% since its inception in December 1993. Franklin India Flexi Cap Fund (Earlier known as Franklin India Equity Fund) turned Rs 10,000 SIP to Rs 16.88 crore with an XIRR of 18.81% since its inception in September 1994. Franklin India Large Cap Fund (Earlier known as Franklin India Bluechip Fund) turned the same SIP to Rs 13.82 crore with an XIRR of 17.29% since December 1993.

These 12 equity mutual funds turned a Rs 10,000 SIP into over Rs 11 crore
Europe
BBC Business

US borrowing costs rise as attempts to ease rates prove short-lived

Image source, Getty ImagesByMichael RaceBusiness reporter, Reporting fromNew YorkPublished21 August 2026Long-term borrowing costs in the US rose again despite an announcement from the government that it would intervene to try to lower them. Earlier this week, the Treasury Department said it would buy back more debt in a bid to lower rates being charged by investors on global bond markets, which governments and major corporations rely on to borrow money. While rates - or yields as they are called - eased on borrowing over 30 years following the intervention, they have since risen again. Such moves can affect mortgage rates and car loans. Economists said the surprise move by the US government had proved short-lived, with ongoing concerns over the level of borrowing as national debt passed $40tn. Governments and corporations sell bonds - essentially an IOU - to raise money for spending, and in return they pay interest. Interest rates on bonds are known as yields. Bond investors typically demand higher returns - or yields - if inflation is high or they expect it to be elevated in the future. Yields had fallen sharply earlier this week to 5.18% from an almost two-decade high of 5.34% following the Treasury Department announcing its "support". By stepping in to buy back government debt, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent aimed to boost demand for bonds and lower borrowing rates. John Canavan, lead analyst at Oxford Economics said the response to the government's intervention was "unsurprisingly short-lived". He said traders were focused on the "daunting" amounts of global borrowing from governments and corporations, as well as increases in oil prices. "As Bessent himself confirmed, the move is mainly a signalling mechanism, with the Treasury showing it is prepared to step in with yields near current levels," said economists at Capital Economics. "It is not necessarily an effective one, however, as much of the initial fall in 30-year yields has now been reversed."

US borrowing costs rise as attempts to ease rates prove short-lived
Europe
The Guardian

What does Tyson’s shutdown of two US beef plants mean for grocery costs?

Security personnel outside a Tyson Foods plant in Eagle Mountain, Utah, on 18 August 2026. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenSecurity personnel outside a Tyson Foods plant in Eagle Mountain, Utah, on 18 August 2026. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty ImagesBusinessExplainerWhat does Tyson’s shutdown of two US beef plants mean for grocery costs?Meat producer closes facilities in Utah and Illinois as beef prices rise for consumers amid historic cattle shortage Tyson Foods, the largest meatpacking company in the US, announced last week that it is closing two of its facilities in Illinois and Utah and selling a beef facility in Washington state, and will lay off hundreds of workers as the supply of cattle hits a 75-year low. The historic cattle shortage has been driven by a multi-year drought, rising costs and severe economic pressures, including consolidation among cattle ranchers. Beef prices have soared over the last year due to the shortage, though economists said the Tyson plant closures likely won’t hit consumer prices so hard. Earlier this month, Tyson reported in its third-quarter earnings that beef volume is down 15.9% and beef operating loss is at $138m. Economists said the Tyson plant closures alone aren’t expected to have a big impact on beef prices. Glynn Tonsor, an agricultural economist at Kansas State University, said the US has had excess capacity for processing and packaging beef for several years now, and beef that would have been processed in Tyson’s Illinois and Utah plants will just be rerouted. “For the majority of the last 40 years, nationally, the US has had more capacity to harvest cattle than we’ve had cattle,” he said. “Anytime you have too much capacity, or ‘too much’ supply relative to what is needed in the market, that puts downward pressure on the margins in that sector. That’s not new.” With not enough cattle to harvest, meatpacking plants have been taking measures to slow down operations, including reducing shifts or cutting Saturday workdays. If operations don’t pick up, plants eventually close. But these closures won’t change the amount of beef that is packed and processed, since the country has enough infrastructure to take on the current supply, experts said. While it may slightly increase transportation costs for the cattle producers who are located close to the shuttered Tyson plants, it is not likely to affect the price of beef overall. “This is just the latest example of the industry attempting to ‘right size’ in relation to current and future animal inventories,” Tonsor said. Instead, the increase in the demand for beef has been a leading force in driving up prices. The quality of beef has improved significantly in the past several years, and consumers are responding favorably, Josh Maples, an agricultural economist at Mississippi State University said. The “general protein craze” seen across the country has also boosted meat consumption. Beef demand has also increased notably compared with other meat products, he said. While the price of beef has outpaced inflation, jumping 9% over the last year, pork and chicken have both dropped in price, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This willingness to pay high prices for beef, however, is coming at a time when general household expenses are increasing for many Americans. The national average price of gas is about $1 more expensive than a year ago, according to AAA. Housing costs are also on the rise, according to the latest census data.

What does Tyson’s shutdown of two US beef plants mean for grocery costs?